A&O – ETHOLOGICAL ATTITUDE (TABLE)

 


TABLE 1 The Ethological Attitude is characterized by:

  •  
  • THE ORGANISM FIRST: the animal we interact with is the center of our concern and a sense of the whole should precede any analysis of its parts
  •  
  • DIRECT AWARENESS of the level of the organization of primary observations: to be  aware that the phenomenon of interest is not being inferred from extrapolation or interpolation based on expectations from other levels.
    • Behavior involves all that is present to the senses.
    • Phenomena of interest range from chemical messengers, their origins, paths and interactions, including the genome and proteome, to cell types and their regional distribution and interactions; tissues, organs, organismic morphology, and eventually endo- and ecto-biotic and abiotic environment.  Facilitated by “DEEP ethology.”
    • Appreciate that some phenomena are barely or only subliminally presented/perceived
      • Appreciate that there is wide variation in individual competence in specific senses, requiring corroboration techniques such as inter-observer reliability to enhance confidence.
  •  
  • INDIRECT AWARENESS of behavior relies on technological prostheses to extend senses and must be approached with care and provided with independent corroboration utilizing alternate techniques.
  •  
  • AWARENESS of CONGENITAL BIAS
    • Consider the respective umwelten of ourselves and of others (e.g., Allen 2015)[i] This will emerge out of the attention to all four perspectives of DEEP ethology.
  •  
  • ESCHEWAL of  ACQUIRED BIAS
    • Epoché is the process, at the core of the Phenomenological Method that allows for the bracketing—setting aside but not denying the possible influence of preconceptions and assumptions
  •  
  • THE NECESSITY OF BALANCING GENERALITIES AND SPECIFICS     
    • Concern for external and internal validity of findings

The “ethological attitude” is informed by a “phenomenological attitude,” close to heart of the qualitative data gathering and interpretation procedures of generations of philosophers, theoreticians, and practitioners of the phenomenological method. 

 


 

[i] Colin Allen (2014) Umwelt or Umwelten? How should shared representation be understood given such diversity? Semiotica, Volume 2014, Issue 198, Pages 137–158, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0105See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270481165 Umwelt or Umwelten? How should shared representation be understood given such diversity? Article  in  Semiotica · February 2014 DOI: 10.1515/sem-2013-010