logo

  • Home
  • Projects
    • Projects Summary
    • DEEP ETHOLOGY
    • S&S – SCIENCE & SPIRITUALITY
    • INTERDISCIPLINARITY
    • ARCHIVE
  • Classes
    • ART & ORGANISM
    • DEEP ETHOLOGY
    • S&S – SCIENCE & SPIRITUALITY
  • Glossaries
    • GLOSSARY: Ethological Terms (including “theories of consciousness,” appended)
    • GLOSSARY: Art and Organism Terms
    • GLOSSARY: Neuropsychiatric Terms
    • GLOSSARY: Neuroethology Terms
  • Presentations
    • Presentations Summary
    • 2016 – The Teachable Moment – session on classroom practice
    • 2015 lecture: Levels of Organization and Consciousness
    • Biomorphic Art and Architecture – Design with Nature
  • Biography
  • Publications
    • Publications
    • Selected Works
  • Contact Me


A&O READING – DYSFUNCTION – Sholl, “Nobody is Normal”

A&O READING

Who is Normal?


Are you average? Typical? Ideal? Adequate? Changes in different cultures and at different times supports the idea that dysfunction is, at best,  a  construct  of historical time and place.

VARIATION is a critical part of evolution by means of natural selection: a variable trait is not locked into a fixed, possibly very narrow environmental niche—it can take advantage of variation in the environment.  DYSFUNCTION implies that the manifest variation is maladaptive—somehow fails to meet one’s biological needs.  For an earlier view, one that arguably brought much attention to the spectrum of adaptive functionality of traits, look at a review of John Ratey’s ideas in Shadow Syndromes.


Read about “Shadow Syndromes”  Look at Jonathan Sholl’s[i] essay, “Nobody is Normal,” published in Aeon on-line magazine:

“The problem of variation haunts medical science. In the 19th century, one of the founders of experimental medicine, the French physiologist Claude Bernard, claimed that individual variability was an obstacle to medical judgment. If we could show that the abnormal was a mere quantitative deviation from the normal, he wrote, we would possess the key to treating any given individual, no matter how he or she veered from the rest. After all, if the pathological is merely a deviation from the normal, then not only the aim but the very possibility of the therapeutic act becomes clear: return the sick individual, organ, cell or system back to a normal state.

This view still guides much of biomedical research; organisms, cells, gene networks and more are routinely perturbed to determine how these systems ‘normally’ function. Researchers disrupt or destroy in order to establish standards and to develop new treatments.

But what are we talking about when we talk about normal physiology? If, as the philosopher Sara Moghaddam-Taaheri wrote in 2011, we see abnormality not as ‘broken normal’ but as a qualitatively different state, it would be difficult to understand how such interventions could restore the sick to health.

While medical researchers might miss such fine points, philosophers of medicine have been parsing the nuances and striving to define ‘normal’ for years. One thought experiment asks us to consider variations on the ends of the spectrum that we would not consider pathological: having green eyes, being colour-blind, being extremely tall or short, having photographic memory, or being a supertaster. These contrast with conditions that could be problematic only in some environments, such as the inability to repair UV damage; with variations that disadvantage only in some cultures or times periods, such as albinism or hearing voices that aren’t there; and with variations so extreme (Tay-Sachs disease, for instance) that they prevent overall functioning.

Yet, even then, life can find a way. For example, there are individuals with a high IQ and otherwise ‘normal’ social life despite having hydrocephalus, a condition in which excessive fluid in the ventricles of the brain enlarges the skull and often results in severe brain damage. How can normality be a scientific concept when its spectrum is so vast? What is normality, really? Do we grasp its meaning? How does one conform to norms?

The Czech philosopher Jiří Vácha provided a helpful taxonomy of normality’s various meanings in 1978. Normality could mean frequent in the sense of being the most common within a population, such as having brown eyes in Mediterranean countries or blue eyes in Nordic countries. It could mean average in the sense of a mathematical mean, such as the average weight or height of a population, often represented with the familiar bell curve, or typical, as in representative of a group, population or general type. Sometimes, normal meant adequate in the sense of being free from defect, deficiency or disorder, and other times it meant optimal in the sense of peak functioning – being physically fit or mentally sharp. Or, it could refer to an ideal Platonic essence, as in the perfect beauty or the perfect body. Finally, there is our basic everyday usage of the word, which often slip-slides among these different meanings and tropes, from the orthodox and standard to what is expected and good.

In any parlance, the specific meaning of ‘normal’ has important consequences, especially if it is given a privileged position in the world. Anything that veers – from having green eyes or hearing voices to living with hydrocephalus – would be abnormal in one sense or another: uncommon, rare, atypical, potentially inadequate, suboptimal or deficient in some way – and in need of being brought back to some norm. Yet, it could be controversial, or just plain odd, to pathologise such variations; especially if they are functional in some way.

This basic insight has lent ambiguity to the word ‘normal’ in medicine for hundreds of years. In the 19th century, just as Bernard was defining disease as deviation from the norm, the Belgian mathematician Adolphe Quetelet was applying statistics to the human body to find a series of ‘types’ across a range of individual variations. Because every variation could be subject to this statistical tool, it seemed that averages could explain anything: hence, height, weight, blood pressure, heart rate, birth and death rates etc could all be presented in nice, even bell curves.

No matter how rare an individual seems, he could still be viewed as normal if the behaviour ensured survival in a given environment

For Quetelet, these averages took on a life of their own; they became not merely a description of nature, but were seen as ideals, as that which ought to be the case. Indeed, the now controversial body mass index (BMI), often used as a measure of health, was originally called the Quetelet Index.

Quetelet claimed that these types captured the homme moyen or ‘average man’ – the ideal human that nature sought to realise, the one right in the centre of what probability theory calls the Gaussian distribution. While such a person need not actually exist in nature, the mathematical figure was seen as the true standard by which to judge deviations as abnormal and, thus, deficient. Consequently, ‘the individual was synonymous with error, while the average person represented the true human being’. Together with Bernard’s views, this was an important step in the privileging of normality that we see today.

The 20th-century French philosopher Georges Canguilhem had a more modern point of view: by chasing the concept of normality, the 19th-century scientists had failed to capture what evolutionary biology says about the variability of organisms. In Le normal et le pathologique (1943), Canguilhem described Charles Darwin’s idea that organisms establish and maintain regularities, patterns of functioning and behaviour to meet the changing demands of living and survival. Canguilhem used the term ‘norm’ to refer to the different regulatory processes, from the internal regulation of hormones to shifting dietary regimes, to remind us that, no matter how rare or deviant an individual seems, he could still be viewed as normal if the behaviour ensured survival in a given environment.

In short, normality is all about context. What is normal for one individual could be insufferable for another, and the same individual could be normal in one environment yet not in another. Just take a look at inborn differences in the ability to metabolise lactose, or acquired variations such as endurance athletes having an enlarged heart and lower resting heart rate. Such examples help to illustrate that normality varies from one individual to the next, and so the mere presence of a variation, or even an anomaly, is not sufficient to understand the pathological.

Environmental relativity is everywhere. There are individuals with asymptomatic hypertension who, upon moving to higher altitudes, begin to suffer chest pains, nausea or shortness of breath from the change. There are those who exhibit variations in the ability to repair UV damage from sunlight ranging from mild skin damage to life-threatening skin malignancies and cancers. There is dyslexia, which some have claimed need only be understood as harmful where reading is a necessary cultural practice. Even a given environment is neither normal nor abnormal. Instead, it is the relationship between the individual and an environment that determines the line between normal and abnormal variations.

Normality is neither absolute nor universal. Yet as far as Canguilhem is concerned, such strictures should never stop us from viewing healthy and pathological phenomena from a biological point of view. Rather, we must see health and disease through their own specific physiological, behavioural and structural regularities, their own causal chains, and their own distinct biological norms.

Toward this end, Canguilhem proposed a distinction between what he termed ‘propulsive’ and ‘repulsive’ norms. Propulsive norms tolerate perturbations and flexibly adapt to changing demands; they allow the individual to overcome challenges. A propulsive immune response would involve the production of antibodies to counter invading germs and toxins.

Repulsive norms avoid perturbations and constrict the individual’s functioning; their very fragility demands a restricted environment. A repulsive immune response to foreign invaders might involve inflammation resulting in hypersensitivity and extreme allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis.

Canguilhem’s inductive approach is at odds with 19th-century medicine and the very concept of normality as a fixed quality, an idea still so prevalent today. Rather than begin with a rigid definition of normality, from which abnormality follows, the Canguilhem method starts with physiology and then seeks theories to explain what is observed.

This produces a line of investigation that medical philosophers now call naturalisation. Clarity might come from concepts such as robustness (maintaining a system despite perturbations), plasticity (shifting between different functional levels), homeodynamics (balancing the effects of ageing) and fragility (increased sensitivity to perturbations). These and related concepts from systems biology – and not the idea of normality – capture what is specific to health and disease.

It could be that the most effective intervention involves changing the environment, and not the patient who feels ill

A systems biology approach also fits more precisely with the relativistic world in which species are constantly changing, and an organism and environment must be in sync. After all, living systems are robust or homeostatic or fragile only with respect to specific internal and external conditions. You cannot say that an immune system, genetic network or a whole organism is robust without specifying a host of biological variables and the environmental parameters that it faces. Living systems are uniquely individual and truly inseparable from their milieu. This forces us to ask: healthy for whom? Relative to what internal or external conditions?

Such concepts are crucial to understanding health and treating disease. The approach can help to destigmatise disease by suggesting that both health and disease are normal, reflecting distinct regularities and ways of living. Disease is neither unnatural nor does it signal the absence of norms: it is a matter of having different norms. This hardly means we should valorise disease; we don’t need to see suffering as beneficial or character-building, nor must we see in mental illness a path to enlightenment. Instead, as naturalisation implies, just because health and disease are normal they are hardly equal or indistinguishable.

Seeing our biology through the lens of naturalisation also provides a new perspective on health preferences. While Canguilhem’s philosophy implies that it is up to the individual to determine what is healthy, this need not mean that health is simply a question of subjective choices or of granting individuals full authority, eg I prefer X whereas you prefer Y and therefore X is healthy for me. Instead, health is individual because of how our unique life histories and behaviours interact with our bodies and minds. Medicine should thus strive to specify what is objectively preferable for every individual given his or her own biology, environment and mode of life.

Taken together, all this suggests that medicine cannot be about restoring previous norms, which might not exist since disease and the mere passage of time irrevocably change living systems. Nor is it about trying to make individuals conform to one-size-fits-all standards and treatments dictated by medical authorities and guidelines, since what is healthy for one individual or system could damage another. Instead, the new, individualised medicine should entail a collaboration with the individual to find a new way of functioning that is specific to that unique physiology and the constraints and possibilities of one’s environment. In many cases, it could be that the most effective intervention involves changing the environment, and not the patient who feels ill.

This fresh perspective has never been more critical, given worries that medical institutions are pathologising normality – enforcing a form of treatment that reflects social or political values instead of actual disease. Whether we are talking about the surge of Ritalin in the classroom or the constantly changing advice about what to eat, it appears that what we need most is a philosophy of medicine that is patient-oriented and attuned to the context of the individual’s life history and the environment in which one lives.


[i] Jonathan Sholl  is an assistant professor in philosophy of science and medical philosophy at Aarhus University in Denmark. His research focuses on naturalising the concepts of health and disease via systems biology, the sociological and anthropological debates about medicalisation, and the tradition of historical epistemology.   For Aeon: 2,000 words  Edited by Pam Weintraub


Search Site


A&O Home – Overview

https://neilgreenberg.com/269-2/

Other Dr. Greenberg Web Sites

  • UT Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
  • UT Web Site

Map

  • #13776 (no title)
  • 00 Home
  • A&O 2025 SPRING SEMINAR CALENDAR
  • A&O OVERVIEW of resources
  • A&O – ABSTRACTION
  • A&O – AESTHETICS
  • A&O – AMBIGUITY and PAREIDOLIA
  • A&O – AMBIGUITY: alternative stories for stars
  • A&O – ART – what is art?
  • A&O – ART & ARTIFACT: SCHOLAR STONES
  • A&O – ART & Mathematics
  • A&O – ART & SCIENCE – The Art & Science of Art & Science
  • A&O – ART and ARTIFACT
  • A&O – ART and EMOTION
  • A&O – ART and SCALE – time and space
  • A&O – ART as a SCIENCE
  • A&O – ART HISTORY
  • A&O – ART in the BRAIN – Experience and Expression
  • A&O – ART MEDIA: AIR
  • A&O – ARTISTIC ATTITUDE
  • A&O – ARTISTIC LICENSE notes
  • A&O – ATTENTION
  • A&O – AUTHENTICITY
  • A&O – BEAUTY and its attributes
  • A&O – BEING and BECOMING notes
  • A&O – BIAS – congenital and acquired
  • A&O – BIASES – congenital and acquired – notes
  • A&O – BIOMORPHIC ART
  • A&O – BRAIN
  • A&O – CHANGE
  • A&O – CHANGE – DEVELOPMENT – LEARNING
  • A&O – COGNITION – STATES of MIND and THEORY of MIND
  • A&O – COGNITION notes incl embodiment
  • A&O – COGNITIVE – MEMORY
  • A&O – COGNITIVE – SOCIAL – ETHICAL CONTEXTS
  • A&O – COGNITIVE DISSONANCE notes
  • A&O – COMMUNICATION
  • A&O – COMMUNICATION – Authenticity and Artists in love with their audience
  • A&O – COMMUNICATION – EMOTION
  • A&O – COMMUNICATION – EYES
  • A&O – COMMUNICATION – LANGUAGE
  • A&O – COMMUNICATION – MEDIA
  • A&O – COMMUNICATION – MEDIA – Music
  • A&O – COMMUNICATION – Non-Verbal
  • A&O – COMPLEXITY
  • A&O – CONNECTIONS
  • A&O – CONNECTIONS – DEVELOPMENT in the brain
  • A&O – CONNECTIONS between INDIVIDUALS
  • A&O – CONNECTIONS in COMPETITION
  • A&O – CONSCIOUSESS – ALTERNATIVE STATES – SLEEP and DREAMING
  • A&O – CONSCIOUSNESS
  • A&O – CONSCIOUSNESS – Alternative Theories
  • A&O – CONSCIOUSNESS – DEEP Ethology
  • A&O – CONSCIOUSNESS – DREAMS
  • A&O – CONSCIOUSNESS note – the “problems” (09/01/2017)
  • A&O – CREATIVITY
  • A&O – DEEP – DEVELOPMENT
  • A&O – DEEP – ECOLOGY
  • A&O – DEEP – EVOLUTION – ADAPTATION
  • A&O – DEEP – EVOLUTION – Adaptationism (07-18-2017)
  • A&O – DEEP – EVOLUTION – Paleolithic (Neandertal) Art
  • A&O – DEEP – EVOLUTION – Paleolithic art and the Dawn of Consciousness
  • A&O – DEEP – EVOLUTION – Ritualization
  • A&O – DEEP – EVOLUTION – spandrels and improvisation
  • A&O – DEEP – EVOLUTION of BEHAVIOR
  • A&O – DEEP – PERCEPTION: VISION
  • A&O – DEEP – PHYSIOLOGY (6-05-2017)
  • A&O – DEEP – PHYSIOLOGY: INPUT notes
  • A&O – DEEP – PHYSIOLOGY: PERCEPTION
  • A&O – DEEP – PHYSIOLOGY: PERCEPTION – UMWELT
  • A&O – DEEP – STRESS defined
  • A&O – DEEP ETHOLOGY – EVOLUTION – Analogy and Homology
  • A&O – DEEP ETHOLOGY – STRESS and ADAPTIVE SCOPE
  • A&O – DEEP ethology of LEARNING
  • A&O – DEEP: INPUT–INTEGRATION–OUTPUT
  • A&O – DEEP: INTEROCEPTION
  • A&O – DESCRIPTION as a tool of insight
  • A&O – DEVELOPMENT of ART
  • A&O – DEVELOPMENT of the BRAIN – Synaptic overgrowth and pruning
  • A&O – DEVELOPMENT: INDIVIDUATION and SOCIALIZATION
  • A&O – DIVERSITY in LEARNING STYLES
  • A&O – DOODLING – Comic Book Ethos of Sousanis
  • A&O – DUALITY notes
  • A&O – DYSFUNCTION
  • A&O – DYSFUNCTION, PATHOLOGY, and OUTSIDER ART
  • A&O – ECOLOGY
  • A&O – ELEMENTS of ART and AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE
  • A&O – EMPATHY – web notes
  • A&O – ERROR DETECTION
  • A&O – ETHOLOGICAL ATTITUDE
  • A&O – ETHOLOGICAL ATTITUDE (TABLE)
  • A&O – EVOLUTION
  • A&O – EVOLUTION – Analogy and Homology
  • A&O – EVOLUTION DRAFT
  • A&O – EVOLUTION of ART
  • A&O – EVOLUTION of BEHAVIOR – BRICOLAGE
  • A&O – EXISTENTIAL PHENOMENOLOGY
  • A&O – EXTRAORDINARY EXPERIENCE – spiritual and mystical
  • A&O – EXTRAORDINARY EXPERIENCES of CREATIVE ARTISTS
  • A&O – FOUND ART – objets trouvé
  • A&O – GENETICS: READING: the minimal genome
  • A&O – IDEA – Negative Space
  • A&O – IDEAS: WUNDERKAMMERN
  • A&O – IMAGINATION notes
  • A&O – INTELLIGENCE
  • A&O – INTRODUCTION
  • A&O – INTRODUCTION-2
  • A&O – INTUITION – SPONTANEITY – IMPROVISATION
  • A&O – INTUITION (05-24-2017)
  • A&O – INTUITION at Bastyr PRESENTATION 05-24-2017
  • A&O – KNOW THYSELF and NOTHING IN EXCESS
  • A&O – KNOWLEDGE is POWER
  • A&O – LEVELS of ORGANIZATION
  • A&O – LOVE notes
  • A&O – MEDIA – LIGHT – COLOR – SOUND
  • A&O – MEDIA – MUSIC and the Emotional Effects of Chords
  • A&O – MEDIA – NATURE – earth, air, fire, water
  • A&O – MEDIA – VISUAL – Color and its meanings
  • A&O – MEDIUM – PERFORMANCE, ACTING, DRAMA
  • A&O – MEMORY
  • A&O – MEMORY & DEEP ETHOLOGY
  • A&O – METAPHORS for the UNKNOWABLE
  • A&O – MIND
  • A&O – MINDFUL
  • A&O – NEEDS
  • A&O – NEEDS – NATURE
  • A&O – NEEDS – PHYSIOLOGY
  • A&O – NEEDS – Self-Actualization
  • A&O – NEEDS – Sociality and Physiology – Loneliness and Solitude
  • A&O – NEEDS – to KNOW
  • A&O – NEEDS met by ART
  • A&O – NEEDS met by ART – moved
  • A&O – NEUROAESTHETICS and beyond
  • A&O – NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY
  • A&O – NEUROPLASTICITY
  • A&O – NEUROSCIENCE of ART & AESTHETICS
  • A&O – NEUROSCIENCE of ART and AESTHETICS, and Artificial Intelligence
  • A&O – OUTSIDER ART – Hospital in Rio (Holston 2004)
  • A&O – OUTSIDER ART (The Electric Pencil: Using Art to Diagnose the Artist – Scheftel 2011)
  • A&O – PATTERNS
  • A&O – PERCEPTION
  • A&O – PERCEPTION – FILLING IN
  • A&O – PERCEPTION – HALLUCINATION
  • A&O – PERCEPTION – INTEGRATIVE and REDUCTIONIST PERSPECTIVES   
  • A&O – PERCEPTION – Nothingness
  • A&O – PHENOMENOLOGICAL ATTITUDE
  • A&O – PHYSIOLOGY – BRAIN – exemplary circuits
  • A&O – PLAY
  • A&O – PLEASURE
  • A&O – POETRY
  • A&O – PROCESS and PRODUCT
  • A&O – READING EXCERPT – Thomas Wolfe -“Each of us is all the sums he has not counted…”
  • A&O – READING: PALEOLITHIC ART or ARTIFACT (NS 2023)
  • A&O – REALITY TESTING
  • A&O – REALITY TESTING: CORRESPONDENCE and COHERENCE
  • A&O – RESONANCE notes
  • A&O – SCIENCE
  • A&O – SELF in the Classroom
  • A&O – SENSORY – SYNESTHESIA notes
  • A&O – SENSORY BIAS and EXPLOITATION
  • A&O – SENSORY EXPLOITATION in ART and SCIENCE
  • A&O – SIMPLICITY
  • A&O – Spiritual Dimension
  • A&O – Stendhal Syndrome
  • A&O – STORIES
  • A&O – SURREALISM
  • A&O – The Golden Mean – nothing in excess
  • A&O – THE REAL versus THE IDEAL – notes
  • A&O – TIME
  • A&O – TIME and ART notes
  • A&O – TRANSLATION
  • A&O – TRUTH – BELIEF – REALITY TESTING – COHERENCE and CORRESPONDENCE
  • A&O – TRUTH and BEAUTY in Art and Science
  • A&O – TRUTH and KNOWLEDGE and REALITY TESTING
  • A&O – TRUTH PPt presentation
  • A&O – UNIQUENESS
  • A&O – Unity in Diversity – Theme and Variation
  • A&O – VALUE in ART
  • A&O – VISION notes – Mona Lisa
  • A&O – WORD – PLEIOTROPY
  • A&O – WORDS – etymology – hidden histories
  • A&O – WORDS (and MUSIC)
  • A&O 2020 CLASS NOTES January 21
  • A&O 2020 CLASS NOTES January 28
  • A&O 2020 final presentation and rationale for format
  • A&O 2021 meeting 7 – March 9
  • A&O 2021 meeting 8 – March 16
  • A&O 2022 meeting 3 – Feb 8
  • A&O 2024 FLYER
  • A&O ANECDOTE – BUTTERFLIES of the MIND
  • A&O ANECDOTE – EDISON and Jeanne d’Arc’s IMAGINATION
  • A&O ANECDOTE – Keith Clark’s Sanglot
  • A&O ANECDOTE – Turner’s Smudge
  • A&O ANECDOTE – TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN
  • A&O ART – Folk Art at Smithsonian American Art Museum
  • A&O ART – HILMA af KLINT
  • A&O ART – The Man with the Golden Helmet
  • A&O at ORICL – day 1/5 (8 Feb 2019)
  • A&O CLASS NOTES April 21 2020
  • A&O Diary
  • A&O EXCERPT – ABOUT PHOSPHENES (1981)
  • A&O EXCERPT – BYRON on DREAMS
  • A&O FIGURE: ETHOLOGICAL SYSTEM in the CLASSROOM
  • A&O FIGURE: LEARNING is ADAPTIVE CHANGE
  • A&O FIGURE: STRESS-RESPONSE CURVE
  • A&O GUEST – John Nolt
  • A&O IDEA – NOTHING
  • A&O IDEA – UMWELT
  • A&O MEETING 14
  • A&O note – INPUT – interoception & proprioception
  • A&O note: Listening Angels
  • A&O NOTES – how to use them
  • A&O notes – RULES, technique
  • A&O notes on ABSTRACTION
  • A&O PERSONAL COACHING DIAGRAM
  • A&O PRESENTATION – Evolution & Ritualization
  • A&O PRESENTATION – Final Report
  • A&O PRESENTATION – The Beasts in Our Brain (2008/2018)
  • A&O PRESENTATION CHECK LIST
  • A&O QUERIES for GORDON BURGHARDT after his PRESENTATION on PLAY 16March2021
  • A&O quote – Art is Everyday Life
  • A&O QUOTE – BORGES on EXACTITUDE in SCIENCE
  • A&O QUOTE – Campbell on aesthetic arrest
  • A&O QUOTE – Constable and Zola and the Functions of Art
  • A&O QUOTE – Delacroix on Painting as Communication
  • A&O QUOTE – Doctorow on creating connections and writing
  • A&O QUOTE – Dostoyevski’s experience
  • A&O QUOTE – Emerson – all things sing to me
  • A&O QUOTE – Emerson on Circles
  • A&O QUOTE – Freud on the three blows to the ego
  • A&O QUOTE – GOETHE on loving what you would know
  • A&O QUOTE – GOETHE on loving what you would know
  • A&O QUOTE – Gorgias’ radical skepticism
  • A&O QUOTE – Henry James’ web of consciousness
  • A&O QUOTE – Hobbes on Consciousness
  • A&O QUOTE – Joseph Campbell: The best things…
  • A&O QUOTE – Lao-Tze – levels of organization – human sociality
  • A&O QUOTE – Levins and Lewontin on DIALECTIC
  • A&O QUOTE – Pascal on the heart
  • A&O QUOTE – Poem about DEEP by Rilke
  • A&O QUOTE – Russell on FALSE CONFIDENCE
  • A&O QUOTE – Shelley on Loves Philosophy
  • A&O QUOTE – Stream of Consciousness
  • A&O QUOTE – The Tangled Bank
  • A&O QUOTE – TIME (Alan Watts)
  • A&O QUOTE – Truth and Art by Harold Pinter
  • A&O QUOTE – Whitman – all truths in all things – spirituality inheres in all creation
  • A&O QUOTE – willing suspension of disbelief
  • A&O QUOTE: Einstein on Religion – letter to Phyllis
  • A&O QUOTES – ART and SCIENCE – resonances – Bernard – Zola – Constable
  • A&O QUOTES – CONNECTIONS
  • A&O READING – “Hallucinations” by Oliver Sacks reviewed
  • A&O READING – “Take This Fish…”
  • A&O READING – “Take This Fish” by Samuel Scudder
  • A&O READING – Animal Signals to Art (De Tiège 2021 in QRB)
  • A&O READING – Anthropomorhism: “In Our Own Image”
  • A&O READING – ART by Dissanayake
  • A&O READING – Art, Imagination, and the Scientist (Root-Bernstein 1997)
  • A&O READING – Article: Power of Backstory at Tate
  • A&O READING – ARTISTIC MIND – Leher (2009)
  • A&O READING – ATTENTION & PERCEPTION (Macknik & Martinez-Conde (2020)
  • A&O READING – Bayesian Reasoning
  • A&O READING – Beauty and the brain: culture, history and individual differences – Jacobsen (2009)
  • A&O READING – Beauty and Truth in Science – Overbye 2002
  • A&O READING – BEAUTY is in the Brain of the Beholder (Ed Yong blog in Discover)
  • A&O READING – Born Again in a Second Language
  • A&O READING – Brain and Mind – Newberg & d’Aquili (2000)
  • A&O READING – brain disorder and art as a symptom – Tommy McHugh
  • A&O READING – BRAIN: “The Brain’s Dark Energy” (Raichle 2006)
  • A&O READING – CONSCIOUSNESS – current research reviewed in The Guardian 2015
  • A&O READING – CONSCIOUSNESS – revealed by its Fractures and Bindings – Holmes & Tucker 2011
  • A&O READING – CONSCIOUSNESS (Steven Pinker in TIE 2007)
  • A&O READING – CONSCIOUSNESS EVOLUTION – comments by Graziano
  • A&O READING – Consciousness revealed by dysfunction – Ramachandran in NS 2017
  • A&O READING – DEEP – BRAIN DEVELOPMENT and the role of EXPERIENCE-
  • A&O READING – DEEP – EVOLUTION – Sexual Selection – Aesthetic Selection
  • A&O READING – DEVELOPMENT of Consciousness in Fetus – Koch
  • A&O READING – Dictation in poetry – 1st Vancouver Lecture by Jack Spicer
  • A&O READING – DYSFUNCTION – EXCERPT from SHADOW SYNDROMES by Ratey
  • A&O READING – DYSFUNCTION – Sholl, “Nobody is Normal”
  • A&O READING – DYSFUNCTION (Parkinson’s Disease) and ART (Pelowski et al 2020)
  • A&O READING – EH GOMBRICH excerpts
  • A&O READING – empirical aesthetics research by Hayn-Leichsenring (2017)
  • A&O READING – EVOLUTION – Claude Levi Strauss on Bricolage (Mambrol 2016)
  • A&O READING – EXCERPT – Teaching as an abstract art form (from K Greenberg et al. 2019)
  • A&O READING – EXCERPT about the TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCE
  • A&O READING – EXCERPT from Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray
  • A&O READING – EXCERPT from Reductionism in Art and Brain Science (Introduction)
  • A&O READING – EXCERPT: “The Nature of Memory” from “The River of Consciousness” (Sacks 2017)
  • A&O READING – EXCERPT: in DEVELOPMENT, the Lasting Effects of Early Influences by Dubos (1969)
  • A&O READING – EXCERPT: Keats on science
  • A&O READING – excerpts about synesthesia
  • A&O READING – Excerpts from “Ecstatic Epilepsy”
  • A&O READING – excerpts from The History of Loneliness (book Review in NYr 6 Apr 2020)
  • A&O READING – Excerpts from The Phenomenological Heart of Teaching and Learning Chap 1 (K Greenberg et al 2019)
  • A&O READING – EXISTENTIAL PHENOMENOLOGY – Philosophy and Method 1989
  • A&O READING – EYE CONTACT (BPS Research Digest 2016) with connections
  • A&O READING – Eye Contact from BBC FUTURE
  • A&O READING – GREENBERG (2019) Getting DEEP (into the Phenomenological Heart of Teaching and Learning
  • A&O READING – Hallucinations – 7 rare disorders
  • A&O READING – Hallucinations and Vision – essay in Cerebrum Jan 2002
  • A&O READING – How Language Shapes Thought (Boroditsky 2011)
  • A&O READING – Illusion of Beauty by Nick Humphrey
  • A&O READING – Imagination and Memory
  • A&O READING – In the River of Consciousness by Oliver Sacks (2004)
  • A&O READING – INDIVIDUATION – SELF – FREE WILL
  • A&O READING – LITERACY and the the BRAIN (Dehaene 2013)
  • A&O READING – Mark Johnson on Meaning, Metaphor, and the Body
  • A&O READING – Meaning and Metaphor by Mark Johnson (2008)
  • A&O READING – Mental self: The person within (Antonio Damasio 2003)
  • A&O READING – Metaphors – Use and Abuse
  • A&O READING – Mirror Neurons (TED talk) by Ramachandran
  • A&O READING – Musicophilia by Sacks reviewed by McGinn
  • A&O READING – NATARAJA at CERN
  • A&O READING – Neuroaesthetics – DMN & Individuality + resources
  • A&O READING – Neurology and the Soul by Oliver SacKs (1990)
  • A&O READING – Neurology and the Soul excerpt (Oliver Sacks, NYRB 1990)
  • A&O READING – neuroplasticity: “The Widening Gyrus”
  • A&O READING – Neuropsychology of Aesthetic, Spiritual, and Mystical States – d’Aquili and Newberg
  • A&O READING – NOVELTY, CULTURE, BIAS – EXCERPT from review of Wexler 2006
  • A&O READING – On the Origin of Art and Symbolism. Michael Balter (2009)
  • A&O READING – Outsider Art – Schwartz in NYRB 2018
  • A&O READING – Paleolithic Art around the world (New Scientist 2021)
  • A&O READING – PALEOLITHIC ART or ARTIFACT? (NS 2023)
  • A&O READING – PERCEPTION – can we perceive REALITY
  • A&O READING – PERCEPTION and FREE WILL – REALITY and PERFECTION (Griffin on Calasso 2013)
  • A&O READING – Perception and Hallucinations (Thompson 2016)
  • A&O READING – PERCEPTION of Reality (Alison George in NS 2020)
  • A&O READING – Phenomenology and Embodied Cognition (Nixon 2020 in AEON)
  • A&O READING – Prematurity and Uniqueness … Gunther Stent in Sci Amer 1972)
  • A&O READING – Qi in the Arts (excerpt from Huan & Rose 2001)
  • A&O READING – Ravidrin on Psychiatric Art in Pysche (2021)
  • A&O READING – Reductionism and Holism (Raman in Metanexus 2005)
  • A&O READING – Reductionism in art and science (Kandel 2016)
  • A&O READING – Rothan on Strevens on science in NYr 2020
  • A&O READING – SCHOLAR STONES
  • A&O READING – SCHOLAR STONES – Rbt Mowry for Christie’s (2015)
  • A&O READING – SENSES – INTEROCEPTION (from Cerebrum 2021)
  • A&O READING – SENSORY EXPLOITATION – Verpooten & Nelissen 2010
  • A&O READING – Sensory Exploitation in Biology and Art (MS 2009)
  • A&O READING – SENTIENCE in animals
  • A&O READING – Shelley’s Defense of Poetry
  • A&O READING – SOCIAL JUSTICE IN ART – Alex Ross (2020) White Supremacy in Music
  • A&O READING – STRESS – effects on cognition
  • A&O READING – STRESS – Maria Popova on Esther Sternberg 2017
  • A&O READING – STRESS by Sapolsky (2003)
  • A&O READING – THE ANOSOGNOSIC’S DILEMMA (Morris, 2010)
  • A&O READING – The Art and Science of Teaching
  • A&O READING – The caddus worm in Leonardo 2004
  • A&O READING – The Emperors New Mind (Chap 3 Mathematics and Reality; Penrose 2002)
  • A&O READING – The Gothic Cathedral
  • A&O READING – The Invention of Empathy (Popova 2016)
  • A&O READING – The Multiplier Effect (Nick Soustanis Boston Globe 2015)
  • A&O READING – The Nature of MUSIC (Gray et al in Science 2001)
  • A&O READING – The Story-Telling Animal (NYT 1984)
  • A&O READING – The Thoughts of a Spiderweb
  • A&O READING – TIME and HOW THE BRAIN CREATES NOW (Laura Spinney reporting 2015)
  • A&O READING – TRACKING the GAZE
  • A&O READING – Ugliness – in Aeon by GE Henderson (2018)
  • A&O READING – UMWELT – How Animals See Themselves
  • A&O READING – Why Men Love War (Broyles 1984)
  • A&O READING – Why Write (Elisa Gabbert in Paris Review 6 July 2022)
  • A&O READING – Witty Ticcy Ray by Oliver Sacks
  • A&O READING – WORDS – what they can (and can’t) mean – Wittgenstein & the Vienna Circle
  • A&O READING — WORDS and Marina Abramović at MoMA in 2010
  • A&O READING –Language and the Brain – Boroditsky (2019)
  • A&O READING – EVOLUTION of ART and SYMBOLISM – Balter 2009
  • A&O READING EXCERPT – creating art activates brain pathway associated with pleasure – 2017
  • A&O READING EXCERPT – Oliver Sacks on NARRATIVE and PERSONHOOD
  • A&O READING EXCERPT – SELF and NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
  • A&O READING EXCERPT – Th Wolfe from Look Homeward Angel
  • A&O READING EXCERPT from the SURREALIST MANIFESTO
  • A&O READING EXCERPT on MANIPULATION, BIAS, INTUITION
  • A&O READING EXCERPT on READYMADE in ART by Duchamp (1917)
  • A&O READING EXCERPTS – Johnson (2007) The Meaning of the Body
  • A&O READING EXCERPTS – NATURE-NURTURE
  • A&O READING excerpts from What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about the Brain by Cristof Koch (2020)
  • A&O READING excerpts on APHORISM
  • A&O READING MUSIC COGNITIVE NEUROLOGY EXCERPTS (Chandra & Levitan 2013)
  • A&O READING on Descartes Radical Doubt
  • A&O READING on Empirical Aesthetics
  • A&O READING on Neuroplasticity and Martha Curtis
  • A&O READING: BORGES on DREAMS (Henry Eliot blog 2019)
  • A&O READING: KENKO – Follow the Brush
  • A&O READINGS
  • A&O VIGNETTE – “What am I doing?”
  • A&O WORD – BRICOLAGE
  • A&O-DEEP ETHOLOGY: evolution, analogy, & physiology
  • AHA! – Eureka, Insight, and Epiphany
  • ART – RECEPTIVE
  • ART – SELF-REPRESENTATION
  • ART & ORGANISM
  • ART & ORGANISM – PRESENTATIONS and PAPERS – RESOURCES
  • ART & ORGANISM at ORICL 2019
  • ART & ORGANISM course description
  • ART & SCIENCE – WIB Beveridge meets William Wordsworth
  • ART & SCIENCE of ART & SCIENCE – 05-11-2017
  • ART & ORGANISM  
  • CANONICAL CONTENT & PERSONAL MEANING
  • CENTAUR – AFRICAN CENTAURS OF APHRODITE (Katherine Neville)
  • CENTAUR – Ancient Coins
  • CENTAUR – article in Torchbearer (2019)
  • CENTAUR – Chiron – reconciling the organ of civilization with the beast in the brain (Radford 1999)
  • CENTAUR – Chiron the Educator
  • CENTAUR – CHIRON, The Wounded Healer
  • CENTAUR – Relict Centaurs In The Roman Empire (Adrienne Mayor)
  • CENTAUR MEMOS (The Hidden History of the Centaur)
  • CENTAUR of VOLOS Home Page
  • DEEP – CNS – About its Activities and Connections
  • DEEP – CNS – FILLING IN – excerpt from Komatsu (2006)
  • DEEP – ECOLOGY – we are HOLOBIONTS
  • DEEP – Glossary of CNS terms related to visual perception
  • DEEP ETHOLOGY
  • DEEP ETHOLOGY – DEVELOPMENT – disintegration and renewal at the cellular level
  • DEEP ETHOLOGY – ECOLOGY – Symbiosis
  • DEEP ETHOLOGY – EVOLUTION
  • DEEP ETHOLOGY – Experimentation (7-31-2017)
  • DEEP ETHOLOGY – HOMEOSTASIS
  • DEEP ETHOLOGY – NEUROSCIENCE – describing the brain & its activity
  • DEEP ethology of LEARNING (physiology)
  • DEEP READING – the slime mold (Zimmer 2011 NYT)
  • drafts
  • ECOLOGY – The Lived Human Environment – Space and Place
  • EPIGRAPHIC – OPENING
  • EVOLUTION of SIGNALS and STRESS
  • existential balance: You and your place in the world
  • EXTRASOMATORY SELF and Extended Phenotype
  • GALLERY: SEMINAR DOODLES
  • GANGLOFF & GREENBERG – BIOLOGY of STRESS (2023)
  • GANGLOFF & GREENBERG (2021) Biology of Stress
  • GLOSSARIES
  • GLOSSARY: Neuroethology Terms
  • GLOSSARY: Art and Organism Terms
  • GLOSSARY: Ethological Terms (including “theories of consciousness,” appended)
  • GLOSSARY: Neuropsychiatric Terms
  • GREENBERG (1978) Ethological Considerations …
  • GREENBERG (1982) Forebrain Atlas
  • GREENBERG (1985) Exploratory Behavior
  • GREENBERG (1987) – Vaughan & Greenberg – propranolol retards MSH activity
  • GREENBERG (1992) Care and Use of A carolinensis for SCAW
  • GREENBERG (1993) PRESENTATION – HOAXES
  • GREENBERG (1993) PRESENTATION – Zoological Hoaxes
  • GREENBERG (1993) Zoological Hoaxes
  • GREENBERG (1994) Ethologically Informed Design
  • GREENBERG (1994) Ethologically Informed Design
  • GREENBERG (1998) The Beasts in the Brain (TVUUC Service)
  • GREENBERG (1999) Narrative Correspondences and the Organ of Coherence
  • GREENBERG (1999) Presentation – The Wounded Healer (at Radford conference)
  • GREENBERG (2002) The Beast at Play: the Neuroethology of Creativity (ANNOTATED)
  • GREENBERG (2003) Review of The Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes and the Civilized Mind, by Elkhonon Goldberg (2001)
  • GREENBERG (2003) sociality stress and corpus striatum
  • GREENBERG (2004) – Truth in the Brain in Beijing
  • GREENBERG (2004) TRUTH in the BRAIN – The Neuroethology of Belief
  • GREENBERG (2007) Ethology of Teaching
  • GREENBERG (2008) The Natural History of Narrative (notes)
  • GREENBERG (2009) – Natural History of Truth at MetaNexus
  • GREENBERG (2009) Natural History of Truth: Neuropsychology of Belief
  • GREENBERG (2015) et al. Patterns in Transformative Pedagogy
  • GREENBERG (2016): Natural History of the Teachable Moment
  • GREENBERG (2018) 2018 – A Natural History of Embodied Cognition : Problems of Consciousness.
  • GREENBERG (2018) IHSRC PRESENTATION
  • GREENBERG (2019) – Getting DEEP – Chap 2 in Phenomenological Heart
  • GREENBERG (2019) – Teaching as an Abstract Art Form
  • GREENBERG (2019) Phenomenological Heart
  • GREENBERG (2021) PRESENTATION – Canonical Content & Personal Meaning – IACEP
  • GREENBERG (2022) Ethologically Informed Design and DEEP Ethology…
  • Greenberg & Desan (1989) CNS depletion abstract
  • Greenberg 2008 – The Natural History of Narrative
  • GREENBERG and MACLEAN (1978)
  • GREENBERG ART – DOODLES 1979-2009
  • GREENBERG ART – Zuihitsu
  • GREENBERG ART – ZUIHITSU – Agamemnon
  • GREENBERG BIBLIOGRAPHY – EDUCATION – TEACHING papers and presentations
  • GREENBERG BIOGRAPHY – Who’s Who
  • GREENBERG et al (1979) role of the paleostriatum
  • GREENBERG et al (1984) role of amygdala
  • GREENBERG et al (1989) REPTILE MODELS
  • GREENBERG et al (2015) Transformative Pedagogy
  • GREENBERG et al. (2016): Presentation – Patterns in Transformative Pedagogy
  • Greenberg et al. 2017 – The Art and Science of Teaching (CHEP conference)
  • GREENBERG Presentations
  • GREENBERG PUBLICATIONS
  • GREENBERG, CHEN, CREWS (1984)
  • GREENBERG, Neil and Kathy Greenberg (2020) – Personal and Shared Meaning
  • GREENBERG, Summers, & Desan (1990) – central monoamines
  • GREENBERG: Biography
  • GREENBERG: Contact Me
  • IDEA – ANOSOGNOSIA
  • IDEA – EMBODIED COGNITION
  • IDEA – EMERGENCE
  • IDEA – EPOCHÉ
  • IDEA – HYPERGNOSIA
  • IDEA – INFORMATION
  • IDEA – INFOVORE
  • IDEA – JANUSIAN THINKING
  • IDEA – MEANING
  • IDEA – MIND MAP
  • IDEA – NORMAL
  • IDEA – PSYCHO-SEMANTIC MIND MAP
  • IDEA – The Essential Tension
  • IDEA – TRANSCENDANCE
  • IDEA – TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCE
  • Kat Test
  • MIND- MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – DAVID on Sand
  • MIND-MAP & POWERPOINT – A&O 2021 – ABBEY – empathy
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – AMELIA on Music
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – ASHLYN on Space
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – ASLAN on Coffee
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – CARLOS on Sensory Deprivation
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – DAUPHIN on Design inspired by nature
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – DELANY on Thread & Blood
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – ELIZABETH
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – ELLIE – beginnings
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – GREG on Oppression
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – HANNAH
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – LAURA on Revitalization
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – LAUREL on Love
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – MAGGIE on pain
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – NIKKI on Dramaturgy
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – PAUL on Analog/Digital
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – PERTO on Music
  • MIND-MAP & PRESENTATION – A&O 2021 – ZOE on milk
  • MINDMAP – A&O 2021 DAVID – sand
  • NEIL GREENBERG – INTERDISCIPLINARY RESUME
  • NEIL GREENBERG ARCHIVE
  • NEIL GREENBERG CLASSES
  • NEIL GREENBERG INTERDISCIPLINARITY
  • NEIL GREENBERG PROJECTS
  • Normal – Lumping & Splitting
  • ORICL 2019: ART & ORGANISM
  • PARABLE – Cynthia’s Tears
  • PARABLE – God is the same everywhere… but I am not
  • PARABLE – Kathy’s Rothko
  • PARABLE – Kazantzakis’ Butterfly
  • PARABLE – The Blind Men and The Elephant
  • PARABLE – The Rothko Date
  • PARABLE – The Ship Of Theseus
  • PARABLE – the two French Philosophers – Knowing and Realizing
  • PARABLE – Two monks saw some goldfish
  • PHENOMENOLOGY at UT
  • PPt – DEEP ETHOLOGY of TEACHING
  • PRESENTATION – KH Greenberg’s “Facilitating a Deeper Understanding of Cognitive Education” (IACEP 2021)
  • PRESENTATION: BEASTS in the BRAIN (2008)
  • Projects
  • QUOTE – NEWTON on the absurdity of gravity
  • READING – Cognitive Enrichment Advantage Learning Styles Inventory (K Greenberg & J Taylor)
  • READINGS – INDIVIDUATION – SELF – FREE WILL
  • S&S – GLOSSARY of TERMS
  • S&S – God of the Gaps
  • S&S – SCIENCE & SPIRITUALITY
  • S&S – SCIENCE and the SPIRIT – the endless essay
  • S&S – Spiritual Wunderkammer
  • S&S READING – On The Origins of Religion (Culotta 2009)
  • SAPIENCE & SENTIENCE
  • SCIENCE & SPIRITUALITY – Overview and Syllabus from ORICL class
  • SCIENCE and SPIRITUALITY: the Essential Tension (ORICL 471)
  • Side Bar – DYSFUNCTION
  • Sitemap
  • SLIDESHOW – A&O on TRUTH
  • Strategic Learning
  • SUMMERS & GREENBERG (1994) Somatic correlates of adrenergic activity
  • SYLLABUS – BIOLOGICAL MYTHOLOGY
  • SYLLABUS – BIOLOGICAL MYTHOLOGY
  • TEACHING PHILOSOPHY
  • TEST
  • TEST PAGE
  • Test Slide Share
  • THE ARTIST
  • UNIVERSITY STUDIES – Projects
  • UNIVERSITY STUDIES – PUBLICATIONS (Teaching-Learning Issues; white papers; monographs)
  • UNIVERSITY STUDIES – The Little Owl of Athens
  • UNIVESITY STUDIES SCHOLAR – Gordon Burghardt
  • WHAT SHOULD I DO?
  • WORD – CREATIVITY
  • WORD – Emotions for which You Never Had a Word (Robson 2017)
  • WORD – Enantiodromia
  • WORD – ESPONTANEO – OLE – DUENDE
  • WORD – Frisson 06-06-2017
  • WORD – Mis en Abyme
  • WORD – Redintegrate
  • WORD – SUBLIME
  • WORD – TEACHABLE MOMENT
  • WORD – WISDOM
  • ZOOM – video conferencing

Copyright © 2017 Neil Greenberg - All Rights Reserved.